Monday, June 17, 2019

Contract law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Contract law - Essay ExampleSince a interrupt of contract implies that one of the parties to a contract has suffered a loss or injuries, the law requires that the other party pay for return to the injured party. Award of damages to the injured party is the major remedy which is available at common law for breach of contract. In general terms, damages refer to the monetary nubble that is determined by the court in order to compensate the injured party. Damages intend to restore the injured party to his previous financial baffle (Beatson and Burrows and Cartwright, 2010, p. 39). In the scenario presented, Megatractors plc has suffered loss as a result of the crashing of the vehicle which was carrying its equipment. Megatractors plc had contracted the services of the Ace Transport Ltd to transport an expensive harvester to a customer, station Farms (Flempton) Ltd. Since Ace Transport Ltd had provided similar services to Megatractors for a number of years, the latter was convinced t hat the former will perform its duty as per the contract. However, this did not slide by as the drivers error caused the vehicle carrying the equipment to crush and badly damaging the equipment thereby causing loss to Megatractors. After the incident, Ace Transport Ltd hash out Megatractors that it intends to rely on the following clause Ace Transport Ltd will not accept any liability for loss or damage caused to customers airscrew during transportation, no matter how the loss or damage was caused. Customers are advised to take out their own insurance. Ace Transport further points out that the clause had been prominently displayed outside the entrance to their main offices, and is also reproduced on the back of all i9nvoices, confirmation of order notices and the receipts of the company as required infra the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 (Stone, 2009, p. 71). In the light of the facts relating to Megatractors scenario and the laws regarding the contract, the Managing Director of Megatractors plc should first be aware of the situations legal correct. Megatractors plc has indeed suffered a substantial loss considering that the equipment which was damaged was described as expensive. As such, the company is ideally supposed to sue in order to recover substantial damages. Inherently, Megatractors plc groundwork sue for special damages because it has suffered a quantifiable monetary loss in this case damaged equipment. In addition, the company has suffered direct losses in the form of economic or consequential losses as a result of lost profits. Since it has been identified that the crushing of the vehicle carrying the equipment was due to drivers error, Megatractors has a right to sue for both punitive and compensatory damages for the tort that was committed resulting to the loss it has suffered (Fafinski and Finch, 2009, p. 20). The damages sought will intend to restore Megatractors plc to the position that it was at before the crushing had taken place. It is paramount for Megatractors plcs Managing Director to know that in order to recover the substantial damages that it has suffered it has to show that it had actually suffered the loss it is claiming. In this case it has suffered two types of losses incidental loss due to the damaged equipment caused by driver

No comments:

Post a Comment