Thursday, January 24, 2019
Evaluating Areas of Knowledge
harmony gutter affect us in numerous ship heapal. It preserve touch emotion or bring back a long-forgotten memory. It is perplex in n earlier e very aspect of life. Anywhere you travel, you come into contact with music. Whether it is on the radio in the car, in the supermarket, or on television, there is no escaping the constant presence of music. music is indited for various reasons and excogitations. Sometimes, composers are compelled to attain a musical work to run their emotions, or even opinions. Music is also created to express the cultural aspects.Since there are so many reasons music is created and purposes it is used for, how is it possible to know music and in what panaches can music be known? According to the International bachelors degree Theory of Knowledge, there are several specific ways of cognise that all(a)ow association songs to be evaluated. The infinitive, to know, can be evaluated by utilise reason, language, perception, and emotion. All of the se ways can be utilized when evaluating the claim I know this music. Also, most of these mentioned ways of knowing can be employ to other(a)(a) areas of knowledge besides the arts.To begin, knowing music can be evaluated by using reason as logic. Obviously, if well-nighone where to make this claim, he could simply be referring to the fact that he had heard it before. But logically, flavour on a deeper level, the claim could mean that he had played by fashion of the music before. practically when musicians play a valet of music, or peculiarly when it is performed, it has greater meaning to them and allows them to know it more than intimately. When vie a piece of music, artists can put their own personal feeling into it.They can diverge certain aspects such as tempo and phrasing. Not only does playing music speak to a listening audience, it speaks to the artist. This makes playing music a very psychological process, as it evokes certain feelings from listener and perfor mer. Very ingenious musicians are sometimes able to merely look at a piece of music, to analyze each note and rhythm, and be able to claim they know the piece. Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart was able to know music in this way. He would compose entire symphonies and concertos entirely in his mind before ever piece of writing them down.And when he did write them down, he never changed a note. Mozart never had to physically hear a piece of music to know what it sounded like he could hear it in his mind. Likewise, this was true for Beethoven, who composed and conducted his ninth symphony after(prenominal) becoming deaf. This process of knowing occurs on a much more intellectual level then actually playing music. However, both methods present knowledge of music. Besides using reason as logic, one can also consider the reason in the purpose of music in order to fully know it.Music is usually always created for some purpose. Composers are inspired and feel compelled to express their creativen ess. However, despite the composers initial purpose for the music, its purpose to society may become completely different. For instance, many early classical composers were hired by courts and forced to compose music for the king. Often they would just write so as to get paid and to preserve themselves from poverty or execution. They would never have imagined that their music would, hundreds of years later, be listened to in the homes of middle class amilies as their children fervently practice the electric current assignment from the piano teacher. Music can be written to express opinions of society, culture, and authority. The popular rapper Eminem, constantly criticized for his outspokenness, articulates his views through his controversial lyrics. Similarly, the members of the heavy coat band fierceness Against the Machine are known for their radical views of presidential term and have even been arrested several times for protesting on the steps of the capital. Rage uses the ir music to communicate their opinions and speak to others who feel the same.Altogether, the purpose of music can be used to evaluate how it is known. Next, the claim can also be evaluated by analyzing certain aspects of language. Semantics is a term often applied to the meditate of meaning in language. In order to study language, one fates to consider two aspects of language denotation and connotation. Denotation can be thought of as the way in which a formulate is defined, as in the dictionary. Connotation, on the other hand, is thought of as the color of the word, or what it implies.Therefore, according to the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, the definition of the verb to know is to perceive directly, or have direct information of, to have understanding of, to recognize the nature of, to recognize as being the same as something previously known, to be acquainted or familiar with, or to have experience of. The denotation of a word is very straightforward and differs from t he connotation in that it lacks emotion. For example, when trying to explain love to a child, it does no good to give them a dictionary definition. On the other hand, the connotation of knowing can be explained in countless ways.For example, the word can infer that there is a strong emotional connection, whether it be positive or negative. The connotation also involves many other areas other than just the word, such as the tone of voice it is said in, or the context in which it is placed. When evaluating a claim, one cannot fully depend on a single aspect of semantics. Both denotation and connotation need to be taken into account in order to evaluate knowledge claims. In addition, perception is another way of knowing. Perception varies between all respective(prenominal)s. Perception makes each person unique.Therefore, it is difficult to make a generalised statement about perception besides the fact that it can drastically change the way identical events are interpreted. Perception can be influenced by many different factors such as culture, economic status, and religion. These factors can be described as filters through which the world is perceived. When applied to a knowledge claim, perception mainly varies between individuals views of what it means to know something. Take, for instance, the individual making the knowledge claim, I know this music.One persons perception of what it means to know could vary from the perception of the person being told. The only way to bridge this gap in perception, is to become tolerant of others views. Applied to others areas of knowledge, these ways of analyzing knowledge claims are valid yet sometimes irrelevant. For instance, the methods work for theoretical, language, and creativity based areas such as politics and the arts. However, when applied to more existent areas like mathematics and the natural sciences, the above methods are not suitable. For these areas, processes such as proofs and the scientific method are use d.