Sunday, April 14, 2013

Authoritarian Rule is Good for Developing Countries

INTRODUCTIONIt is often said that evolution countries do not arouse the luxury of res publica. Prof. David Byrne (2005, p. 28), Director of Postgraduate Studies in the School of utilise Social Sciences, University of Durham, has argued that freedoms and individualism that Western democracy is so skilful in emphasising are ineffective tokens for the majority who live in poverty.

The aim of this paper is to illustrate the detrimental effects ill-timed democracy can bear upon developing countries, their people, upon the institution of democracy and the future democratic transitions. It is not the intention of this paper to call that authoritarian rule is a more superior carcass of governance than democracy, or that authoritarianism is the only governance governance feasible for developing countries.

What is being proposed is, due to the indigenous cultures, traditions, great power structures, ideologies, institutions, values and history of inherent in many developing countries, democracy today would have very little fate for success (Pinkney, 2003).

The installation of Western democracy into developing countries that drop the political infrastructure, institutions, traditions of conflict management, power structures or education to underpin it, risk more damage to most than their current diversity of authoritarian governance. is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!

In the content following, I will be discussing the concept of authoritarian rule, the five fundamental elements found to be essential for a successful democracy, and provide several accounts of democratic transitions.

AUTHORITARIANISMThe term Authoritarian rule did not originally defy the sinister undertones it now suggests. The traditional meaning of Authoritarianism proposes WHO ruled, and favoured obeisance to authority. For example, a Monarch, Elder, Chief, Sultan. ?The power of traditional authoritarian rule was neither unlimited nor arbitrary? (Hague & Harrop, 2001, p. 31), and nor were all leaders feared or despised.

The modern construal of Authoritarianism projects HOW rule is organised, and in the view of...

If you exigency to get a full essay, order it on our website:

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper

No comments:

Post a Comment